Trials
The Supreme Court refused to revive Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's 9/11 plea deal.
On Monday, Oct. 19, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and two co-defendants seeking to reinstate 2024 plea agreements that would have taken the death penalty off the table in the Sept. 11 case. The order gave no explanation, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh recused himself.
By Crime Talk Network Staff Writer ·

A one-line denial on an order list ends a two-year fight over a deal that lasted two days. The 2024 agreements would have traded guilty pleas for life without parole. Then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin pulled them, an appeals court backed him, and Monday's order leaves that ruling standing. The case now heads toward a military trial tentatively set for June 5, 2028, with death still a possible sentence.
The New York Post reported that on Monday, Oct. 19, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court turned down Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's bid to restore the plea agreement he reached with military prosecutors in 2024. Axios reported the denial came on the court's Monday order list in Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, et al. v. United States, that the order did not explain the decision, and that Justice Brett Kavanaugh recused himself. Axios noted Kavanaugh served as associate counsel to President George W. Bush, and the Post reported he was in the White House counsel's office when Mohammed was captured in 2003. The Post reported there were no noted dissents. AP News also reported the court would not revive the deal. An unexplained denial is not a ruling on the merits. It leaves the lower court's decision in place.
The agreements date to July 31, 2024. The New York Post reported that Mohammed and co-defendants Walid bin Attash and Mustafa al-Hawsawi agreed with the Office of Military Commissions to plead guilty and accept life sentences without the possibility of parole. Two days later, amid a national outcry, then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin rescinded the deals, saying only the Pentagon chief could authorize such an agreement. Axios quoted Austin as saying that "responsibility for such a decision should rest with me," and reported the decision to offer the deals had drawn outrage from some 9/11 victims' families. A military court first sided with the defendants, Axios reported, before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit sided with Austin. The Post reported that appeals panel was divided. Monday's order was the defendants' last stop.
Mohammed is charged with 2,977 counts of murder, terrorism and violations of the law of war, among other offenses, the New York Post reported. The attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, killed 2,977 people at the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. The 2004 bipartisan 9/11 Commission report described him as the "principal architect" of the attacks, and the Post reported he was quoted at a 2007 U.S. military hearing as saying, "I was responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z." Those are the charges and his reported statements. A military jury has not decided them.
The case has been stuck for most of a quarter century. The New York Post reported the delays grew out of disputes over evidence obtained from the three men during CIA "enhanced interrogation," that Mohammed and four other accused men were charged in 2008 and recharged four years later, and that in August a military judge threw out statements Mohammed gave the FBI in 2007, ruling they were not voluntarily given. Axios reported the men have been held at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, since 2006, that prosecutors had sought a January 2027 trial, and that a judge found that left too little time for pretrial issues. The tentative trial date is now June 5, 2028. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Shop
Checkout is on Shopify. A few from the rack:
More on the desk

By Crime Talk Network Staff Writer
A Santa Fe judge sentenced Isaac Apodaca to life in prison plus 15 years in the sword killing of Grace Jennings.
The term The New Mexican reported from Thursday's hearing is life plus 15 years, consecutive, with the 15-year sentence served first. That is the judgment the paper says Judge Ellington imposed. KOAT's July 15 story still had the hearing on Aug. 24 and described the exposure as up to life. Kiara McCulley's 30-year figure is not in the same tense in every account: KOAT said in July that she is serving it, and The New Mexican said Thursday that she is expected to receive it.
Read the take
Reporting noted by The New Mexican, KOAT, and KOB.

By Crime Talk Network Staff Writer
A Fort Wayne jury found Domonique Drew guilty of murder in the gas station shooting of Scott Reed Armstrong.
Thursday's verdict is the jury's finding on the murder count and the firearm enhancement. The sentence has not been imposed. The surveillance video, the witness identification and the apology letter described in court records are the prosecution's account that the jury accepted. Drew's statement to police that the victim spat on him is his account. The jury did not credit it as a defense to murder.
Read the take
Reporting noted by 21Alive and The Journal Gazette.

By Crime Talk Network Staff Writer
Kevin Jaimes Martinez was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in a Knoxville laundromat shooting.
The conviction and life term came the same day, according to the district attorney. Under Tennessee law, a life sentence means 51 years before parole eligibility, WBIR reported. The stolen-phone motive is the prosecution's account of why the shooting happened. WBIR's report did not name the man who was killed.
Read the take
Reporting noted by WBIR and Knox County District Attorney's Office.
