Trials
Howard Cooper said he expects Lindsay Clancy to testify in Patrick Clancy's suit against her medical providers.
Boston 25 News reported Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2026, that Patrick Clancy's lawyers were in court on his wrongful-death suit against providers who treated Lindsay Clancy, including South Shore Health. The New York Post reported lawyer Howard Cooper said she is expected to testify, once her Fifth Amendment issues are resolved, that she told those providers she had homicidal ideation. People put the hearing on Oct. 29.
By Crime Talk Network Staff Writer · · Updated

Wednesday's hearing is about whether the civil claims go forward. It is not a finding that any provider was negligent, and it is not a verdict in the murder case. Boston 25 News and the New York Post do not put the appearance in the same courthouse. Cooper's prediction that Lindsay Clancy will testify is not her testimony.
Boston 25 News reported Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2026, at 2:34 p.m. EDT, in a story datelined Plymouth, that Patrick Clancy's lawyers were appearing in court that afternoon on his civil lawsuit against medical providers who treated his former wife, Lindsay Clancy. The New York Post, published at 4 p.m. the same day, captioned a photograph of his lawyer, Howard Cooper, outside Dedham Superior Court in Dedham after a hearing on whether the wrongful-death suit against her mental-healthcare providers can proceed. Plymouth and Dedham are not the same courthouse. People reported he would appear on Oct. 29 for a hearing to determine whether that civil case moves forward. Oct. 28 and Oct. 29 are not the same day. Boston 25 News and the New York Post put the appearance on Wednesday. People put it on Thursday.
Boston 25 News reported the suit accuses the providers of negligence that he alleges led to the deaths of the couple's three children at their Duxbury home in January 2023, and that he claims the providers failed to properly monitor her condition and improperly prescribed medication. South Shore Health is among the defendants, the station reported. It printed this from the lawsuit: "The bevy of diverse and powerful medications they misprescribed, coupled with their abject failure to appropriately monitor Lindsay, resulted in Lindsay's mental health deteriorating to the point of suicidal ideation and requiring inpatient care." The same passage says that negligent treatment "resulted in tragedy, namely, allegations that Lindsay took the lives of her children," and that if the providers had given adequate care, "it is more likely than not that Patrick and Lindsay's children would still be alive today." Those sentences are allegations in a complaint. The three children are not named here. Boston 25 News reported South Shore Health said it could not comment on the litigation and that it always strives to provide excellent care to its patients.
The New York Post reported Cooper said he expects Lindsay Clancy to testify in the wrongful-death suit once the criminal case wraps up. The Post reported he said: "Once her 5th Amendment issues are resolved one way or the other, she will testify that she told these defendants explicitly that she had homicidal ideation [and] that she was worried about something awful happening to her kids." The bracket is the Post's. The complaint language Boston 25 News printed says suicidal ideation. The statement the Post reported says homicidal ideation. Those are not the same word. The Post reported he also said, "I can't imagine a more explicit threat," and, "Defendants seem to think that you need to have a date, time, place and manner that the threat is going to be delivered." The Post reported lawyers for the providers said there was not evidence she told them she thought about hurting the children, and that the providers claim a legal immunity covering doctors, nurses, and hospitals. An expectation that she will testify is not testimony. An immunity argument is not a ruling.
The criminal case is a different docket. Boston 25 News reported Wednesday that the trial ended in September with a hung jury, and that her lawyers have argued she killed the three children while suffering from postpartum psychosis. The mistrial was Sept. 4. Jurors split 11-1, with the majority for a finding that she was not criminally responsible. Boston 25 News reported a Plymouth Superior Court judge denied a motion for a required finding of not guilty. The next criminal hearing is Nov. 2 in Plymouth Superior Court, on the defense motion to dismiss on double-jeopardy grounds. A mistrial is not an acquittal, and this civil hearing does not decide the murder charges. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Shop
Checkout is on Shopify. A few from the rack:
More on the desk

By Crime Talk Network Staff Writer
Nicole Virzi pleaded guilty to third-degree murder and was sentenced to 35 to 80 years.
Wednesday's plea is the conviction on those three counts, and the 35-to-80-year term is the sentence on the plea. A first-degree murder count is not the judgment. What she told detectives about shaking and dropping the infant is her recorded statement, as TribLive reported it. The parents' account of why they wanted a plea is what the prosecutor told the court.
Read the take
Reporting noted by WTAE and TribLive.

By Crime Talk Network Staff Writer
Judge William Watson sentenced Charles Stokes to 14 years and 8 months to serve for shooting Heather Burrow.
Tuesday's terms are the sentence on a guilty plea to six felonies. The Courier-Record printed 74 years imposed, 58 years and 4 months suspended, and six terms that add to 73 years if the firearm count is the three-year mandatory minimum it listed. WTVR printed 74 years with all but 14 years and 8 months suspended. Both accounts leave 14 years and 8 months to serve.
Read the take
Reporting noted by The Courier-Record and WTVR.

By Crime Talk Network Staff Writer
Samuel Rocha was sentenced to 27 years to life for driving into bicyclists in Port Hueneme.
Tuesday's term is the sentence on an August guilty plea to second-degree murder and on the April jury convictions for assault and battery. The jury did not return a murder verdict. The office and the Los Angeles Times print the 16-year-old's name. This story does not, and it does not name the other minors who were hurt.
Read the take
Reporting noted by Ventura County District Attorney's Office and Los Angeles Times.
