Skip to content

Trials

An anti-terrorism court sentenced Imaan Mazari and Hadi Ali Chattha to 10 years each.

The Associated Press reported Thursday that Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra sentenced human rights lawyers Imaan Mazari and Hadi Ali Chattha to 10 years in prison each after a trial inside Adiala prison in Rawalpindi. The AP said they had pleaded not guilty on Oct. 7 in a case over security arrangements for England's cricket team in 2024.

By Crime Talk Network Staff Writer · · Updated

Imaan Mazari and Hadi Ali Chattha in court
Photo: AFP via Geo News

Ten years each is the sentence the Associated Press reported after a trial, on a case in which they had pleaded not guilty. The not-guilty pleas are what the AP said they entered when they were indicted. The AP describes a barrier case on a cricket route, and it does not set out every count in the order or report an appeal.

The Associated Press reported Thursday, Oct. 29, 2026, in a story updated at 12:22 p.m. UTC, that a Pakistani court sentenced a prominent human rights lawyer and her husband to 10 years in prison each. The AP said Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra of an anti-terrorism court announced the verdict against Imaan Mazari and Hadi Ali Chattha after their trial inside Adiala prison in the garrison city of Rawalpindi. The AP said the case involves a breach of security arrangements for England's cricket team during its 2024 visit, and that the sentence is according to a court order. The dateline is Islamabad.

The AP reported the case stems from an October 2024 incident in which the couple removed road barriers in Islamabad along a route designated for the visiting team. It reported prosecutors accused them of obstructing police and inciting public unrest. It reported they were indicted on Oct. 7 and pleaded not guilty. The AP reported Mazari disputed the prosecution's account, saying she was trying to reach court to represent a client when police stopped them at a roadblock. A not-guilty plea is what they entered. The verdict the judge announced is what the AP reported after the trial.

The AP reported the couple are known for representing journalists and political and human rights activists, including families seeking information about relatives allegedly detained by security agencies. The 10-year terms are the sentences the AP reported on Thursday's verdict. The AP story does not print a breakdown of every statute, a fine, or a notice of appeal. What it does print is a 10-year sentence for each of them after they pleaded not guilty and the judge announced the verdict. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Share on XEmail

Get the take when the jury is out, the Court drops an order, or we go live.

Shop

Checkout is on Shopify. A few from the rack:

All merch

More on the desk

Official portrait of former FBI Director James Comey
Trials

By Crime Talk Network Staff Writer

Judge Trevor McFadden took James Comey's motion to dismiss the Espionage Act information under advisement.

An information is a prosecutor's charging document. It is not a grand-jury indictment, and it is not a conviction. McFadden did not grant or deny the motion on Friday. The fight is whether filing that information on the last day of a 10-year limitations period lets the government keep seeking an indictment, and the two accounts do not print the same thing about whether prosecutors are in front of a grand jury now.

Read the take

Reporting noted by CBS News and MS NOW.

Judge Ada E. Brown at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing
Trials

By Crime Talk Network Staff Writer

A Fifth Circuit committee ordered Judge Ada Brown to a psychiatric exam, and the council reassigned her docket.

The Sept. 29 order is an administrative reassignment under 28 U.S.C. § 332(d). It is not a medical diagnosis, and the order says it is separate from whatever the council does when the committee files its report. Judge Haynes abstained, and Chief Judge Debra Brown voted no on procedural grounds. Bloomberg Law, the ABA Journal, and Fox News identify the lawyer in the redacted hearing item as Ezra Young.

Read the take

Reporting noted by Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit, ABA Journal, Bloomberg Law, Fox News, and KERA.

Trials

By Crime Talk Network Staff Writer

Federal prosecutors charged Hanh Minh Nguyen with animal crushing in the Santa Ana puppy case.

The federal count is a criminal complaint for animal crushing, and the Orange County counts are felony accusations. Neither is a conviction, and she has not been sentenced in either court. The District Attorney's release says the puppy was 9 weeks old and that she was arrested Thursday, Oct. 2. CBS Los Angeles says the puppy was about 9 months old and that she was arrested Oct. 1. Those ages are not the same age, and those dates are not the same date.

Read the take

Reporting noted by CBS Los Angeles, City News Service, Orange County District Attorney, and NBC Los Angeles.